Canada is consulting on significant changes to the Express Entry system that would give extra priority to applicants working in higher‑paid occupations. These reforms are not yet in force, but if implemented they could reshape how Comprehensive Ranking System (CRS) scores are calculated and which candidates receive invitations to apply for permanent residence.
As part of a 2026 public consultation, Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship Canada (IRCC) is exploring a new “high‑wage occupation” factor that would award additional CRS points to candidates with Canadian work experience or a qualifying job offer in occupations whose median wages are well above the national median. In this draft model, occupations are grouped into three wage‑based tiers, defined using multiples of the national median wage:
IRCC would assess wages at the occupation level using data sources such as Statistics Canada and the Job Bank, rather than looking at each candidate’s individual salary. This means that everyone with qualifying experience in the same occupation would have the same potential to earn high‑wage CRS points, regardless of personal pay differences due to location, employer, or hours worked.
IRCC has not yet released an official list of “high‑wage occupations.” The formal list, if the proposal moves forward, would be published on IRCC’s website and updated regularly, likely on an annual basis.
Because no official NOC list exists yet, most of the examples circulating online come from independent analyses that compare Job Bank median wages with the national median wage. These examples suggest that occupations such as:
Selected trades and technical roles with strong wage outcomes could fall into the 2x, 1.5x, or 1.3x wage tiers. However, these are only illustrative estimates. They should not be treated as confirmation that any particular NOC will qualify. Until IRCC publishes an official list, no occupation can be guaranteed inclusion or exclusion.
Tier | Occupation | NOC Code |
2x national median wage | Specialists in surgery | 31101 |
General practitioners and family physicians | 31102 | |
Specialists in clinical and laboratory medicine | 31100 | |
Senior managers – financial, communications and other business services | 00012 | |
Government managers – education policy development and program administration | 40012 | |
Government managers – economic analysis, policy development and program administration | 40011 | |
Senior government managers and officials | 00011 | |
Petroleum engineers | 21332 | |
Computer and information systems managers | 20012 | |
Architecture and science managers | 20011 | |
1.5x national median wage | Government managers – economic analysis, policy development and program administration | 40012 |
Administrators – post-secondary education and vocational training | 40020 | |
Software engineers and designers | 20041 | |
School principals and administrators of elementary and secondary education | 40021 | |
Mining engineers | 20036 | |
Cybersecurity specialists | 21122 | |
Electrical and electronics engineers | 20032 | |
Managers in transportation | 70020 | |
Secondary school teachers | 41220 | |
Software engineers and designers | 21231 | |
1.3x national median wage | Contractors and supervisors, electrical trades and telecommunications occupations | 72011 |
Central control and process operators, mineral and metal processing | 93100 | |
Systems testing technicians | 20046 | |
Business development officers and market researchers and analysts | 41402 | |
Financial and investment analysts | 11101 | |
Steamfitters, pipefitters and sprinkler system installers | 72111 | |
Ironworkers | 72105 | |
Crane operators | 72500 | |
Securities agents, investment dealers and brokers | 11103 | |
Land surveyors | 21203 |
Under the consultation proposal, IRCC is considering adding new CRS points for candidates who have:
In this context, “high-wage occupations” are jobs with salaries higher than the national median wage. These occupations are divided into tiers based on how much they pay compared to the national median wage for all workers:
The higher the wage tier, the greater the potential CRS benefit may be.
A key design feature is that IRCC would not measure individual wages. Instead, it would assign occupations to tiers based on national wage data at the NOC level. Everyone with qualifying experience in the same occupation would be treated the same for the purposes of these points.
This approach is intended to:
The precise number of CRS points for each tier, and the final list of eligible occupations, have not yet been decided and are key topics of the ongoing consultation.
IRCC is also consulting on bringing back meaningful CRS points for job offers, but in a more targeted way. Under the proposal, CRS points for job offers would be restricted to offers in high‑wage occupations rather than applying broadly to most skilled jobs as in earlier years.
While the government has not yet finalized the legal definition of a qualifying job offer within this new framework, current signals suggest that IRCC would likely align it with existing rules. In practice, this would probably mean a full‑time, non‑seasonal job offer in a high‑wage occupation, supported either by a positive Labour Market Impact Assessment (LMIA) or by an eligible LMIA exemption under current policy.
Until IRCC publishes final regulations or program delivery instructions, the exact point values, eligible NOC codes, and documentary requirements for job‑offer points under the new model remain subject to change.
The proposed reforms reflect IRCC’s growing focus on long‑term economic outcomes and labour‑market performance. Research cited in departmental presentations indicates that immigrants who earn higher incomes before or shortly after arrival tend to:
IRCC has also highlighted that candidates arriving in senior‑level or high‑earning positions tend, on average, to earn significantly more than those who land in Canada without arranged employment. This evidence underpins the move toward preferentially allocating CRS points to occupations with stronger wage and outcome indicators.
However, the proposed system does not exclude skilled workers in lower‑wage occupations from Express Entry. Candidates in non-‑high‑wage occupations would continue to compete for invitations based on traditional CRS factors such as:
What may change, if the proposal is implemented, is the relative advantage held by candidates who already work in or have offers in high‑wage occupations in Canada.
As of May 2026, the Express Entry features related to the high-wage occupation adjustments have not yet been implemented. IRCC is running a public consultation process, inviting feedback from stakeholders and the public on its proposed reforms and overall design of the Federal High Skilled programs.
Key status points:
IRCC’s public statements and those of the practitioners appear to indicate there are also significant other changes to Express Entry under consideration that may be implemented in the next 12-18 months. The changes are expected to be implemented in 2027 or later, as there is no officially communicated date for when they will first be implemented.
It is also possible that the high-wage occupations adjustment will be implemented before other changes, depending on other policy considerations and the system’s capacity to accommodate it. There is currently no formally communicated date for this. The details are also subject to change.
Until the reforms are finalized, the current Express Entry rules will apply. However, if the high wage occupation factor is introduced within the Express Entry system as proposed, the following patterns are likely to emerge:
These candidates could see their competitiveness increase due to new CRS points tied to high‑wage occupations and possibly to high‑wage job offers. Their occupation may also become a central focus. As a result, candidates may focus more on immigration status and the consolidation of Canadian work experience, and their work experience may need to align with their classification under the NOC.
These applicants may qualify under Express Entry, but they may receive no benefits from the high-wage factor. Competitiveness for these candidates will still be influenced by age, education, language, and Canadian work experience. For some, the employer-driven provincial nominee programs may also be of increased importance.
Overseas candidates would not gain a direct benefit from the high‑wage factor unless they secure a qualifying job offer in a high‑wage occupation. They would continue to rely on core CRS factors and may need to consider strategies such as improving language scores, gaining additional education, or pursuing Canadian study/work pathways or provincial nomination options to remain competitive.
The Canadian government’s high-wage occupation factor might substantially influence the selection of candidates for Express Entry. However, the changes are still under consultation, with no confirmed occupations, CRS points, or implementation timeline yet.
Until further information from Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship Canada (IRCC), candidates should concentrate on increasing their CRS points through language proficiency, education, and work experience.